Kaya Moss: MEDebate Connection: California Proposition 14 and Stem Cell Research
- Kaya Moss
- Oct 21, 2020
- 2 min read
Updated: Jun 17, 2022
Recently, we at MEDITalks & Thoughts had our first MEDebate. The topic of the debate was the embryonic stem cell controversy and whether or not ESCs should be used for research purposes. This debate raised several interesting points that are very timely, considering that California’s Proposition 14 is on a similar subject. Prop 14 will “[authorize] $5.5 billion state bonds for: stem cell and other medical research” and will delegate a portion of that money to research on the brain, specifically (Official Voter Information Guide). Both voters and activists have provided reasons for voting for or against in a matter similar to that of our debate.
A vote for “yes” on Prop 14 means that money will be provided “for stem cell research and the development of new medical treatments in California” which could advance research in this field. Specifically, it could lead to new developments in cures and treatments for Parkinson’s Disease, Alzheimer’s Disease, Diabetes, Heart Disease, and other potentially life-threatening diseases. The proposition could even help with COVID-19 research. Additionally, the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine would use this money to advance research and replenish funds that have been depleted, causing the halt of multiple projects in 2019. If this proposition was passed, the institution would be able to continue with research. Some proponents of this proposition are the American Association for Cancer Research, the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, the National Medical Association, and the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce, as well as many individual doctors and politicians. According to the official argument in favor of Proposition 14, a “yes” on the proposition “could save your life or the life of someone you love”.
On the other hand, those who give a “no” vote on Proposition 14 believe that it “would commit $7.8 billion we cannot afford during this economic and budget crisis” and cause more economic strain, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic (Official Voter Information Guide). Some issues cited are poor management within the medical agencies it supports, and lack of results after prior investments. Additionally, taxes could be raised and public service workers could be laid off. The viability of these treatments has also been questioned by some, who say that the procedures are too dangerous and don’t live up to expectations. Still, the main argument is the economic outcomes of the proposition, including higher taxes and strain amidst the economic decline occurring because of COVID-19. Currently, no political action committees have formally come out against the proposition. As stated in the official argument, voting “no” on Prop 14 would avoid “[wasting] billions”.
In conclusion, California Proposition 14 could give billions to stem-cell research, paving the way for many discoveries and treatments, but it could potentially increase taxes and cause economic strain during these unprecedented times. Whether you vote “yes” or “no” on Prop 14, make sure to get out and vote on November 3rd. As you can see by the impact just one proposition will have, the twelve propositions and government officials elected on November 3rd will have a big impact on the country’s future.
By: Kaya Moss (MEDItalks & Thoughts Member, 10th Grade)
Sources:
Comments